<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ohio Home Inspection Licensing - HB 257</title>
	<atom:link href="http://columbusbestblog.com/real-estate/ohio-home-inspection-licensing-hb-257/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://columbusbestblog.com/real-estate/ohio-home-inspection-licensing-hb-257/</link>
	<description>A blog about the best of Columbus &#038; Central Ohio by Maureen McCabe of Real Living HER</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 18:51:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: MaureenMcCabe</title>
		<link>http://columbusbestblog.com/real-estate/ohio-home-inspection-licensing-hb-257/#comment-8161</link>
		<dc:creator>MaureenMcCabe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 11:47:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://columbusbestblog.com/ohio/ohio-home-inspection-licensing-hb-257/#comment-8161</guid>
		<description>Do you personally favor licensing of inspectors David?  Or oppose it? Or are you on the fence? 

I don't really understand the comment about real estate agents or REALTORS® "They are concerned that home inspectors can continue to disrupt their transactions with no disciplinary measures other than the courts.  One person told me “we just want a way to discipline home inspectors who write bad reports”.  

I always thought licensing was about the consumer having recourse not about real estate agents.  I never thought of real estate agents using licensing to discipline inspectors.  

I have never looked at  home inspectors disrupting a transaction, they are looking out for their clients interest.  Hopefully they have the expertise to do so.  It's the consumers choice whom they bring to look out for their interest in a transaction.   I thought licensing was just a way to weed out the people who have no expertise who might miss things for consumers. 

I thought OAR's support for licensing of home inspectors had to do with concern for consumers not concern for real estate agents but maybe it is just lip service.  I will have to read up on it. 

The Belmont Technical College study is interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you personally favor licensing of inspectors David?  Or oppose it? Or are you on the fence? </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t really understand the comment about real estate agents or REALTORS® &#8220;They are concerned that home inspectors can continue to disrupt their transactions with no disciplinary measures other than the courts.  One person told me “we just want a way to discipline home inspectors who write bad reports”.  </p>
<p>I always thought licensing was about the consumer having recourse not about real estate agents.  I never thought of real estate agents using licensing to discipline inspectors.  </p>
<p>I have never looked at  home inspectors disrupting a transaction, they are looking out for their clients interest.  Hopefully they have the expertise to do so.  It&#8217;s the consumers choice whom they bring to look out for their interest in a transaction.   I thought licensing was just a way to weed out the people who have no expertise who might miss things for consumers. </p>
<p>I thought OAR&#8217;s support for licensing of home inspectors had to do with concern for consumers not concern for real estate agents but maybe it is just lip service.  I will have to read up on it. </p>
<p>The Belmont Technical College study is interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
